Skip to main content
London city skyline at dusk, United Kingdom financial district

About the Firm

Objective Financial Analysis for Corporate Deadlocks

We deliver clear financial analysis and business valuation data that resolves complex shareholder and corporate disputes in court, arbitration, and structured settlement processes worldwide.

Mission

Shareholder Dispute Expert exists to answer one question with mathematical rigour: what is the true financial value or economic loss at the center of this corporate dispute? Every service and every report is oriented around that question.

Contentious corporate valuation is not an academic exercise. It requires commercial acumen and strict forensic discipline to protect equity stakes and withstand judicial or tribunal scrutiny across jurisdictions.

Our Values

Absolute Uncompromising Independence

Expert metrics built strictly on verifiable market indicators and empirical ledger analysis. We form views unswayed by instructing parties or target outcomes.

Forensic Rigour

No speculative asset mapping or unsubstantiated valuation multiples. Every discount rate, growth factor, and normalization adjustment must be supported by clear market realities and corporate books.

Commercial Reality

Companies are dynamic operating businesses. Our valuations look past book entries to understand market positioning, supply chain reliance, and true maintainable earnings.

Discretion & Privacy

Corporate deadlocks can destroy commercial value if mishandled. Every intake pipeline, file structure, and diagnostic step is handled with institutional-grade security.

WorldwideUK (England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) · cross-border shareholder disputes · international arbitration and litigation support

Technical foundations

Contentious Valuation Methodology & Expert Standards

Independent forensic accounting and business valuation built for shareholder disputes, partnership breakups, and cross-border corporate litigation.

Income approach (DCF and capitalised earnings)

Maintainable earnings are isolated through forensic normalization, then capitalised or discounted using defensible growth and risk assumptions tied to market evidence.

Market approach

Comparable company and transaction multiples are applied only where the subject entity and dispute context support reliable benchmarking.

Asset-based approach

Adjusted net asset values are used where earnings are unreliable, in asset-heavy businesses, or where liquidation or break-up scenarios are in issue.

Fair value vs minority discount

Articles, shareholders' agreements, and quasi-partnership assumptions determine whether a pro-rata or discounted minority stake is the correct economic outcome.

Expert witness and procedural standards

  • CPR Part 35 and Practice Direction 35 (England & Wales)
  • Expert witness duties of independence, clarity, and range of opinion
  • Single Joint Expert (SJE) and joint statement protocols
  • Cross-border evidence coordination with local counsel and tribunal rules
  • Document integrity, privilege, and secure data handling on instruction

Professional Standards

  • CPR Part 35 and Practice Direction 35 (England & Wales)
  • Expert witness duties of independence, clarity, and range of opinion
  • Single Joint Expert (SJE) and joint statement protocols
  • Cross-border evidence coordination with local counsel and tribunal rules
  • Document integrity, privilege, and secure data handling on instruction